Interesting that the position is not only internal only, not only faculty only, but TENURED faculty only. I'm curious how Tennessee's tenure review process uniquely qualifies people to serve as ombuds.
All good points. It seems like a misguided effort to have an ombuds who "knows" the culture and can act without fear of termination (although they could be terminated from the ombuds position). In light of this, I would prefer such searches to have a term limit (3 yr appointment) so 1) the position doesn't become a glorified retirement with pay role which can be common in higher ed searches with similar criteria, 2) uniquely qualified candidates can serve the university without derailing their active academic careers and 3) others can acquire the skills necessary to aspire toward the position. It is telling that this search is only taking place because the current ombuds are retiring/stepping down from the position. This is too important of a position, especially for an environment like UTK, for such shortsided thinking.
Interesting that the position is not only internal only, not only faculty only, but TENURED faculty only. I'm curious how Tennessee's tenure review process uniquely qualifies people to serve as ombuds.
ReplyDeleteAll good points. It seems like a misguided effort to have an ombuds who "knows" the culture and can act without fear of termination (although they could be terminated from the ombuds position). In light of this, I would prefer such searches to have a term limit (3 yr appointment) so 1) the position doesn't become a glorified retirement with pay role which can be common in higher ed searches with similar criteria, 2) uniquely qualified candidates can serve the university without derailing their active academic careers and 3) others can acquire the skills necessary to aspire toward the position. It is telling that this search is only taking place because the current ombuds are retiring/stepping down from the position. This is too important of a position, especially for an environment like UTK, for such shortsided thinking.
ReplyDelete